Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
We find no merit to the defendant's contention that his confession was obtained in violation of his right to counsel because the interrogating detectives either knew or should have known that there was a pending charge against him. Given the defendant's representation that his last arrest had been "disposed of", the detectives cannot be charged with either actual or constructive knowledge of a pending charge or
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.