1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 167 A.D.2d
  5. 167 A.D.2d 499 (1990)
 

BURGESS v. CITY OF NEW YORK

167 A.D.2d 499 (1990)

Careefe Burgess, an Infant, by His Mother and Natural Guardian, Dawn Burgess, et al., Appellants, v. City of New York et al., Respondents, Linden Plaza, Inc., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent; Lance Investigation Service, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

November 26, 1990

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court's limitation of disclosure to those incidents that took place in the area of the ramp where the plaintiff was injured was within that court's sound discretion and should not be disturbed (see, Kolody v Supermarkets Gen. Corp., 163 A.D.2d 276; Zimmerman v New York City Tr. Auth., 115 A.D.2d 738

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases