PER CURIAM.
Defendant seeks review of his conviction for one count of armed kidnapping and one count of unarmed kidnapping.
Appellant argues that the trial judge committed reversible error by communicating with the jury during the deliberation process outside the presence of Appellant and his counsel even though Appellant's counsel subsequently concurred in such communication.
Any such communication was non-prejudicial since defense counsel...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
