PER CURIAM.
Appellant Asberry has challenged his convictions and sentencing for robbery with a weapon, and grand theft. He contends that the trial court erred (1) in admitting hearsay testimony, (2) in failing to strike the jury panel and (3) in denying his motion for mistrial. Because we reverse and remand for a new trial on point one, we do not reach the remaining issues on appeal.
Asberry's defense at trial was misidentification. The state presented the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
