1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 238 N.J.
  5. 238 N.J. Super. 410 (1990)
 

FISCH v. BUREAU OF CONST. CODE ENF.

238 N.J. Super. 410 (1990)

570 A.2d 2

GEORGE FISCH AND SYDNEY FISCH, PETITIONERS-APPELLANTS, v. BUREAU OF CONSTRUCTION CODE ENFORCEMENT, NEW HOME WARRANTY PROGRAM, RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS, AND TODAY'S LIFESTYLE, INTERVENOR-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 23, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Neal Herstik argued the cause for appellants (Blaustein & Wasserman, attorneys; Neal Herstik on the brief).

Mark I. Siman, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondents (Peter N. Perretti, Jr., Attorney General, attorney; Mary C. Jacobson, Deputy Attorney General, of Counsel; Mark I. Siman on the brief).

Michael W. Sozansky, Jr., argued the cause for intervenor Today's Lifestyle (Ligorano & Sozansky, attorneys; Michael W. Sozansky on the brief).

Before Judges MICHELS, DEIGHAN and BROCHIN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by DEIGHAN, J.A.D.

This is an appeal of a final decision of the Commissioner of the Department of Community Affairs (Department) denying petitioners George and Sydney Fisch (petitioners) an award under the New Home Warranty and Builders' Registration Act, (Act) N.J.S.A. 46:3B-1 et seq.

Petitioners and intervenor Today's Lifestyle (builder) participated in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases