CITY OF NEWARK v. (497) BLOCK 1854


244 N.J. Super. 402 (1990)

582 A.2d 1006

CITY OF NEWARK OF THE COUNTY OF ESSEX, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. (497) BLOCK 1854, LOT 15, 9-11 SOUTH 7TH STREET, CHIQUITA REALTY, INC., (498) BLOCK 1854, LOT 17, 13-17 SOUTH 7TH STREET, CHIQUITA REALTY, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND ROLAND FOGLIA, RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 9, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James A. Key, Jr. argued the cause for appellant (James A. Key, Jr., attorney; James A. Key, Jr., on the brief).

Lewis M. Markowitz and Lorraine K. Wilson argued the cause for respondent Roland Foglia (Epstein, Epstein, Brown & Bosek, attorneys; Lorraine K. Wilson, on the brief).

Brief of respondent, City of Newark of The County of Essex was suppressed.

Before Judges BILDER and BROCHIN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by BROCHIN, J.A.D.

Pursuant to R. 4:50, Chiquita Realty, Inc. moved to vacate a judgment entered in accordance with the In Rem Tax Foreclosure Act, N.J.S.A. 54:5-104.29 et seq., which foreclosed its equity of redemption in two parcels of real estate, lots 15 and 17 in Block 1854 in the City of Newark. Chiquita Realty, Inc. claimed that, in violation of its rights to due process of law guaranteed by the state...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases