REVELS v. HOECHST CELANESE CORP.

1479

301 S.C. 316 (1990)

391 S.E.2d 731

Richard REVELS, Appellant v. HOECHST CELANESE CORPORATION and John Doe, of whom Hoechst Celanese Corp., Respondent.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina.

Decided April 2, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Leeds Barroll, IV and Bonnie P. Horn, Columbia, for appellant.

R.W. Dibble, Jr. and Jane W. Trinkley, both of McNair Law Firm, Columbia, Marc E. Kasowitz and Jack Atkin, both of Mayer, Brown & Platt, New York City, for respondent.


Heard March 14, 1990.

Decided April 2, 1990.

GOOLSBY, Judge:

The dispositive issue in this personal injury action brought by Richard Revels, an employee of Kenan Transport Company, against Hoechst Celanese Corporation is whether Revels was Celanese's "statutory employee" when he was injured at Celanese's distribution terminal while assisting in the loading of chemicals into Kenan's tanker. The trial court granted Celanese's motion for summary judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases