DEMERS v. CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS

No. CX-90-198.

458 N.W.2d 151 (1990)

David Pearce DEMERS, Respondent, v. CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Granted September 14, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark R. Anfinson, Minneapolis, for respondent.

Robert J. Alfton, Minneapolis City Atty., Floyd B. Olson, Deputy City Atty., Minneapolis, for appellant.

Considered and decided by FORSBERG, P.J. and KALITOWSKI and MULALLY, JJ.


OPINION

KALITOWSKI, Judge.

Appellant City of Minneapolis challenges the judgment requiring it to allow respondent David Demers to inspect nonpending and noncurrent police department internal affairs complaint forms without charge. The city argues the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act and policy considerations require that complainants' names be protected and not subject to public disclosure.

FACTS

David Demers is a graduate student...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases