Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the expert testimony at trial was not based entirely on comparative tests using "known" but uncertified standards, but on a series of different tests, using other scientific means. Thus, the court properly allowed the expert to express her opinion that the substance sold by the defendant was cocaine and it was for the trier of fact to determine what weight to give her opinion (see...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
