Ordered that the order, as amended, is affirmed, with costs.
The defendant's final identification of the subject areas as "coastal erosion hazard areas" pursuant to ECL article 34 did not create any basis for the plaintiffs' challenge to the statute and regulations as unconstitutionally vague (see, ECL 34-0103; 6 NYCRR part 505 et seq.; Matter of Consolidated Edison Co. v Department of Envtl. Conservation,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.