MURPHY v. CAPONE


168 A.D.2d 437 (1990)

Terence W. Murphy, Respondent, v. Sally Capone et al., Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

December 3, 1990


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in granting the plaintiff leave to serve a third amended verified complaint (see, Murray v City of New York, 43 N.Y.2d 400). As the defendants concede, the amendments the plaintiff sought to make, with the exception of the withdrawal of 6 of the 8 causes of action, were only of "the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases