Defendant was indicted for two knifepoint robberies and identified by the complainants in both photo arrays and a lineup. Defendant challenges the photo array as suggestive because it contained more than one photograph of him. Where an identification procedure is "so impermissibly suggestive as to give rise to a very substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification", testimony regarding that identification will be excluded (Simmons v United States,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. LIGGINS
159 A.D.2d 443 (1990)
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. William Liggins, Appellant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
March 29, 1990
March 29, 1990
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
