STATE v. SULLIVAN


244 N.J. Super. 357 (1990)

582 A.2d 835

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. FRANCIS SULLIVAN, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 20, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard C. Szuch, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for appellant (W. Michael Murphy, Jr., Morris County Prosecutor, attorney).

Peter N. Gilbreth argued the cause for respondent Francis Sullivan (Stephen S. Weinstein, attorney).

Clifford J. Weininger argued the cause for respondents Herman Wertheim and Charles Palma (Robert M. Zaleski, on the brief).

R. Gregory Leonard argued the cause for respondent William Jenkins (Leonard & Butler, attorneys; John R. Scott, on the brief).

Chiarolanza & DeAngelis, attorneys for respondent Charles Palma.

Herbert M. Korn, attorney for defendants Donna Sutton (Wolsky) and Robert Wolsky.

Before Judges GAULKIN, SHEBELL and HAVEY.


The opinion of the court was delivered by GAULKIN, P.J.A.D.

The State appeals by leave granted (R. 2:2-4) from an order suppressing certain "wiretap tapes, logs and evidence derived therefrom." The questions raised are (1) whether section 14 of the New Jersey Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance Control Act (N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-1 et seq.) was violated when the State failed to record 62 calls intercepted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases