Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The appellants were properly found in contempt of the court's prior order dated September 22, 1987. That order was clear and unequivocal, and, therefore, the appellants' disobedience was properly punishable as contempt (see, Matter of Department of Envtl. Protection v Department of Envtl. Conservation,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.