PRINCE v. FIRMAN

No. 89-213.

584 A.2d 8 (1990)

Kenneth PRINCE, et al., Appellants, v. John FIRMAN, et al., Appellees.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided December 11, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edmund H. Feldman, Washington, D.C., with whom Jeffrey Nadel, Culver City, Cal., was on the brief, for appellants.

Louis P. Robbins, with whom C. Francis Murphy, Washington, D.C., and John E. Prominski, Jr., Fairfax, Va., were on the brief, for appellees.

Before ROGERS, Chief Judge, and STEADMAN and FARRELL, Associate Judges.


STEADMAN, Associate Judge:

The question presented in this appeal is whether a District of Columbia statutory provision that church property revert to the contributors of the property upon dissolution of the church violates the free exercise clause of the First Amendment.1 The provision in question, D.C.Code § 29-911 (1981), is part of a chapter dealing with "Religious Societies" and reads:

Upon the dissolution of any society...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases