PER CURIAM.
We affirm the order holding appellant in contempt. According to the Agreed Statement of the Case the motion for contempt was based upon the allegation that appellant had violated the temporary injunction, by a specific act prohibited by the injunction order in which he was a named party. The trial court's order finds that appellant, an individual, violated the injunction. While appellant contends that he cannot be found individually liable for the acts...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
