SMITH v. KRIS-BAL REALTY, INC.


242 N.J. Super. 346 (1990)

576 A.2d 934

FRANK SMITH, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. KRIS-BAL REALTY, INC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND MICHAEL BALSAMO, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 10, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard B. Ansell argued the cause for appellant (Ansell, Fox, Zaro, McGovern & Bennett, attorneys; James M. McGovern, Jr., of counsel; Jane M. Ryan, on the brief).

Elliott Abrutyn argued the cause for respondent Kris-Bal Realty, Inc. (Morgan, Melhuish, Monaghan, Arvidson, Abrutyn & Lisowski, attorneys; Elliott Abrutyn, on the brief).

Before Judges KING, SHEBELL and BAIME.


The opinion of the court was delivered by KING, P.J.A.D.

This case involves the use of a safety code, specifically regulations under the federal Occupational Safety and Health Act, as part of the basis for an expert's opinion on the duty of care owed to plaintiff, a business invitee. We conclude that the OSHA code, when used in connection with expert testimony, may be relied upon to illustrate industry standards and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases