PRITCHARD v. MEAD

No. 89-1413.

155 Wis.2d 431 (1990)

455 N.W.2d 263

Edward C. PRITCHARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William MEAD, and Rainfair, Inc., Defendants-Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided March 28, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

On behalf of the plaintiff-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Robert E. Sutton of Sutton & Kelly of Milwaukee.

On behalf of the defendants-respondents, the cause was submitted on the brief of Lisa Stephens Neubauer, David M. Lucey, and Jon P. Christiansen of Foley & Lardner of Milwaukee.

Before Brown, P.J., Scott and Nettesheim, JJ.


SCOTT J.

Edward Pritchard appeals from a summary judgment granted to William Mead and Rainfair, Inc. (collectively, "Rainfair"). Pritchard raises three issues on appeal: (1) whether sec. 180.72, Stats., represents an objecting stockholder's exclusive remedy; (2) whether substantial compliance with the statute is sufficient; and (3) whether the statute is constitutional. Finding none of Pritchard's arguments persuasive, we affirm.

Pritchard, a Rainfair employee...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases