NOLAN v. LEE HO


120 N.J. 465 (1990)

577 A.2d 143

TARA NOLAN, AN INFANT BY HER MOTHER, PAULINE NOLAN, AND PAULINE NOLAN AND THOMAS NOLAN, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. LUISITA S. LEE HO, M.D., AND REUBEN DEULOFEU, M.D., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided July 31, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Martin N. Crevina argued the cause for appellants (Frank J. Nostrame, attorney; Eric F. Frizzell, on the brief).

Robert W. Donnelly, Jr., argued the cause for respondent Luisita S. Lee Ho, M.D. (Dughi and Hewit, attorneys).

Scott T. Heller argued the cause for respondent Reuben Deulofeu, M.D. (Giblin, Combs, Cooney & Conway, attorneys; E. Burke Giblin, on the letter in lieu of brief).


PER CURIAM.

The tragic circumstances underlying this medical malpractice suit do not immediately concern, yet cannot be divorced from, the issue before the Court: whether the trial court acted properly in vacating a final settlement agreement without having first conducted a testimonial hearing.

I.

Plaintiff Pauline Nolan is blind, the result of a binary enucleation to remove malignant tumors during her infancy. Pauline's daughter, Tara, was born...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases