1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 567 So.2d
  5. 567 So.2d 17 (1990)
 

STUDNICKA v. CARLISLE

No. 90-0820.

567 So.2d 17 (1990)

George STUDNICKA, Petitioner, v. James T. CARLISLE, et al., Respondents.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Rehearing and Clarification Denied October 18, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George Studnicka, West Palm Beach, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Carol Cobourn Asbury, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for respondent, James T. Carlisle.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of prohibition is denied. Petitioners who are represented by counsel should file pleadings only through counsel. A defendant who has court-appointed counsel may not act as co-counsel as a matter of right. Goode v. State, 365 So.2d 381 (Fla. 1978). Nonetheless, we have considered the petition for writ of prohibition on the merits, and deny the petition on each point raised. As to the issue...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases