1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 220 Cal.App.3d
  5. 220 Cal.App.3d 364 (1990)
 

WEINSTEIN v. E.F. HUTTON & CO.

Docket No. B042651.

220 Cal.App.3d 364 (1990)

269 Cal. Rptr. 443

BETSY WEINSTEIN et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. E.F. HUTTON & CO., INC., et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five.

May 16, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Stanbury & Fishelman and Bruce C. Fishelman for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Keesal, Young & Logan, Michael M. Gless and Robert D. Feighner for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

ASHBY, J.

Plaintiffs and appellants Sanford M. Weinstein and others sued defendants and respondents E.F. Hutton & Co., Inc., and others to recover investment losses, asserting various theories of fraud, misrepresentation, negligence and breach of fiduciary duty. After a three-day nonjury trial, the court entered judgment in favor of respondents. Appellants appealed that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases