Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Initially, we note that the defendant's claim that the Grand Jury proceedings resulting in his indictment were defective is not reviewable on this appeal from the ensuing judgment of conviction, which, contrary to the defendant's contention, we find, as hereinafter explained, to be supported by legally sufficient evidence (see, CPL 210.30 [6]; People v Hall,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.