DOWNTOWN RESIDENTS v. CITY OF HOBOKEN


242 N.J. Super. 329 (1990)

576 A.2d 926

DOWNTOWN RESIDENTS FOR SANE DEVELOPMENT, AN UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATION, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. THE CITY OF HOBOKEN AND THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HOBOKEN, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND APPLIED DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES, INC., DEFENDANT/INTERVENOR-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 5, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gerald J. Muller argued the cause for appellants (Miller, Porter & Muller, attorneys; Gerald J. Muller on the brief).

Eugene P. O'Connell argued the cause for respondents (Eugene P. O'Connell, Director, Department of Law of City of Hoboken, attorney; Eugene P. O'Connell on the brief).

Morris Stern argued the cause for intervenor-respondent (Stern, Dubrow & Marcus, attorneys; Morris Stern and Philip D. Stern on the brief).

Before Judges PRESSLER, LONG and LANDAU.


The opinion of the court was delivered by LANDAU, J.A.D.

Downtown Residents for Sane Development (Residents), plaintiffs in an action in lieu of prerogative writs, appeal from a summary judgment entered in favor of defendants The City of Hoboken (City), The Council of the City of Hoboken (Council) and defendant-intervenor Applied Development Associates, Inc. (Applied). Residents challenge the Observer Highway Redevelopment Plan (Plan) adopted in April 1988 by the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases