1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 460 N.W.2d
  5. 460 N.W.2d 106 (1990)
 

STRONG v. RICHFIELD STATE AGENCY, INC.

No. C3-90-494.

460 N.W.2d 106 (1990)

Carolyn A. STRONG, et al., Appellants, v. RICHFIELD STATE AGENCY, INC., et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

September 18, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles T. Hvass, Jr., Minneapolis, for appellants.

Katherine L. MacKinnon, Arthur, Chapman & McDonough, Minneapolis, for respondents.

Considered and decided by GARDEBRING, P.J., and HUSPENI and CRIPPEN, JJ.

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Appellants seek review of a directed verdict granted after receipt of their evidence. The trial court ruled appellants failed to show that respondent property owner either caused the hazard on or made extraordinary use of the municipal property upon which appellant Carolyn Strong was injured and therefore had a duty to maintain it. We affirm.

FACTS

Respondent Richfield State Agency owned a commercial building and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases