STATE v. AMERMAN

Nos. 715, 716, September Term, 1990.

84 Md. App. 461 (1990)

581 A.2d 19

STATE OF MARYLAND v. JENNIFER ANN AMERMAN. STATE OF MARYLAND v. QUENTIN DAVID MADDOX.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland.

October 30, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Valerie J. Smith, Asst. Atty. Gen. (J. Joseph Curran, Atty. Gen., on the brief), Baltimore, for appellant.

Michael D. Steinhardt (Forman & Steinhardt, P.A., on the brief), Glen Burnie, for Jennifer Ann Amerman.

Keith Krissoff (Krohn & Krissoff, P.A., on the brief), Annapolis, for Quentin David Maddox.

Argued before MOYLAN, ROSALYN B. BELL and KARWACKI, JJ.


MOYLAN, Judge.

The Theme

The controlling principle dictating this reversal of a suppression order is that when a judge, either at a pretrial suppression hearing or at trial, sits in review of another judge's earlier determination that probable cause existed to issue a search and seizure warrant (or an arrest warrant), the reviewing judge sits in an appellate-like capacity with all of the attendant appellate constraints. Although he may ordinarily...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases