1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 395 S.E.2d
  5. 395 S.E.2d 143 (1990)
 

STATE v. RICHARDSON

No. 896SC1130.

395 S.E.2d 143 (1990)

100 N.C. App. 240

STATE of North Carolina v. Belva Phipps RICHARDSON.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

September 4, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Atty. Gen. Lacy H. Thornburg by Asst. Atty. Gen. Norma S. Harrell, Raleigh, for State.

Glover & Petersen, P.A. by Ann B. Petersen and James R. Glover, Chapel Hill, and Johnson and Jones by Bruce C. Johnson, Conway, for defendant-appellant.

WELLS, Judge.

Defendant first contends that the trial court erred in admitting testimony that she had committed several other alleged criminal offenses. Defendant's contention is that the evidence of these other alleged crimes, wrongs, or acts should have been excluded pursuant to N.C.Gen.Stat. § 8C-1, Rule 404 of the N.C. Rules of Evidence (1988).

After a voir dire hearing, Betty Avent was allowed to testify that in the ten-month period preceding...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases