MIRASOLA v. GILMAN


163 A.D.2d 371 (1990)

Dean A. Mirasola et al., Respondents, v. Henry Gilman, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

July 9, 1990


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The factual determination in this case involved one of the credibility of the witnesses. "The advantages of the trial court who saw and heard the witnesses should be considered and, when truth hangs upon the credibility of witnesses [its] decision should be given the greatest weight" (Amend v Hurley, 293 N.Y. 587, 594; see, Northern Westchester Professional Park Assocs. v Town of Bedford,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases