Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the evidence adduced was legally insufficient to establish his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt is without merit. There was legally sufficient evidence adduced at trial from which the jury could fairly infer that the defendant knowingly acted with the intent to sell heroin to an undercover officer and that in furtherance thereof, he solicited, requested, commanded, importuned or intentionally aided...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
