FINGERHUT CORP. v. SUBURBAN NAT. BANK

No. C2-90-504.

460 N.W.2d 63 (1990)

FINGERHUT CORPORATION, Respondent, v. SUBURBAN NATIONAL BANK, a United States Corporation, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

August 21, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Patrick J. McLaughlin, Mary E. Senkus, Patrick T. Skelly, Oppenheimer Wolff & Donnelly, Minneapolis, for respondent.

Bradley N. Beisel, Scholle and Beisel, Ltd., Minneapolis, for appellant.

Considered and decided by NORTON, P.J., and GARDEBRING and KLAPHAKE, JJ.


OPINION

NORTON, Judge.

Appellant seeks review of trial court judgment that respondent, which registered its notice of lis pendens against registered property before appellant registered its mortgage, was entitled to priority.

FACTS

This appeal follows a court trial upon stipulated facts. Appellant Suburban National Bank ("Suburban") and respondent Fingerhut Corporation ("Fingerhut") both lost money to a third party, one Connelly. Connelly...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases