1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 461 N.W.2d
  5. 461 N.W.2d 49 (1990)
 

MROZIK CONST. v. LOVERING ASSOCIATES

No. C8-90-961.

461 N.W.2d 49 (1990)

MROZIK CONSTRUCTION, INC., Respondent, v. LOVERING ASSOCIATES, INC., Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

October 2, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jack D. Elmquist, Jack D. Elmquist Law Offices, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Henry E. Mueller, Grannis, Grannis, Hauge, Eide, Anderson & Keller, P.A., Eagan, for respondent.

Considered and decided by KALITOWSKI, P.J., and DAVIES and THOREEN, JJ.

OPINION

KALITOWSKI, Judge.

Appellant Lovering Associates, Inc. challenges the trial court's grant of summary judgment for respondent Mrozik Construction, Inc., arguing that payment by the owner to the general contractor was a condition precedent to payment by the general contractor to the subcontractor.

FACTS

Appellant Lovering Associates, Inc. (Lovering) is a general contractor of commercial buildings. In 1986, Stratford Investments, Ltd...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases