1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 242 N.J.
  5. 242 N.J. Super. 267 (1990)
 

D'AGOSTINO v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON

242 N.J. Super. 267 (1990)

576 A.2d 893

RICHARD J. D'AGOSTINO, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, ROBERT N. WILSON AND RONALD G. GELBMAN, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 23, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alan E. Kraus argued the cause for appellants (Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti, attorneys; Alan E. Kraus, of counsel and on the supplemental letter brief; Laura J. Lokker and David P. Arciszewski, on the brief).

Douglas V. Rigler, admitted pro hac vice, argued the cause for respondent (Kaplan, Russin & Vecchi and Lasser, Hochman, Marcus, Guryan & Kuskin, attorneys; Douglas V. Rigler and Richard L. Zucker, on the brief and supplemental letter brief; Bruno A. Ristau, on the brief).

Before Judges KING and SHEBELL.

The opinion of the court was delivered by SHEBELL, J.A.D.

At issue in this interlocutory appeal is the propriety of a Law Division order requiring defendant corporation to produce certain officers and employees of its wholly-owned foreign subsidiaries for depositions in New Jersey. Plaintiff Richard J. D'Agostino's complaint against defendants Johnson & Johnson, a New Jersey corporation, Robert N. Wilson and Ronald F. Gelbman filed on December 4, 1986, in the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases