The agency's inspection of the premises failed to provide objective evidence supporting petitioners tenants' administrative complaints of inadequate heat and/or hot water. Moreover, respondent landlord established that although the provision of heat had been interrupted on seven dates in the relevant one-month period, this was caused by the necessity of servicing and adjusting newly installed boiler equipment, which, on each occasion, was promptly attended to by landlord...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
