We agree with defendant Liberty Studios, Inc. that the notice of discovery and inspection served by counterclaim defendant Justin Crasto, which contained 48 numbered demands with numerous subparts, as well as its first set of 107 interrogatories, also containing numerous subparts, was overbroad and unduly burdensome, and that it was, therefore, an improvident exercise of discretion for the Supreme Court to have denied Liberty's request to strike (Metzger v Brockman
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
EDITEL, NEW YORK v. LIBERTY STUDIOS, INC.
162 A.D.2d 345 (1990)
Editel, New York, a Division of Bell & Howell/Columbia Pictures Video Services, Plaintiff, v. Liberty Studios, Inc., Appellant, and Justin Crasto, Counterclaim Respondent, et al., Counterclaim Defendants
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
June 26, 1990
June 26, 1990
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
