1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 393 S.E.2d
  5. 393 S.E.2d 111 (1990)
 

STATE EX REL. UTIL. COM'N v. PINEHURST

No. 8910UC825.

393 S.E.2d 111 (1990)

99 N.C. App. 224

STATE of North Carolina, ex rel. UTILITIES COMMISSION, Public Staff and Regional Investments of Moore, Inc., Applicant-appellees, v. VILLAGE OF PINEHURST, Intervenor-appellant.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

July 3, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

DeBank, McDaniel, Heidgerd, Holbrook & Anderson by William E. Anderson, Raleigh, and Brown, Robbins, May, Pate, Rich, Scarborough & Burke by W. Lamont Brown, Southern Pines, for intervenor-appellant Village of Pinehurst.

Hunton & Williams by Edward S. Finley, Jr., Frank A. Schiller and Alaine Y. Miller, Raleigh, for applicant-appellee Regional Investments of Moore, Inc.

WELLS, Judge.

We note at the outset that the Village, in violation of N.C.R.App.P., Rule 28, has presented its arguments in the brief without any reference whatsoever to assignments of error pertinent to the questions. The Village's appeal is therefore subject to dismissal. Because this appeal presents important questions of public interest, we exercise our discretionary authority pursuant to N.C.R.App.P., Rule 2, and proceed to an examination of the merits of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases