AMERICAN FAMILY MUT. INS. CO. v. VANMAN

No. C8-89-310.

453 N.W.2d 48 (1990)

AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, Appellant, v. Robert VANMAN, et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

March 23, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James A. Stein, Lee A. Henderson, Hessian, McKasy & Soderberg, St. Paul, for appellant.

Randall G. Spence, Michael C. Snyder, Meshbesher, Singer & Spence, St. Paul, for respondents.

Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.


COYNE, Justice.

Reversing judgment in favor of American Family Mutual Insurance Company, the court of appeals held that a reparation obligor is not entitled to common law indemnity from an uninsured motorist for basic economic loss benefits paid pursuant to the assigned claims plan. American Family Mut. Ins. Co. v. Vanman, 442 N.W.2d 351, 354 (Minn.App.1989). We affirm.

On November 9, 1983, Marcella Sperl, a pedestrian...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases