Defendant's guilt was established beyond a reasonable doubt by credible evidence that the undercover officer had two encounters with defendant, culminating in the sale of crack, after which the officer confirmed that the correct person was taken into custody. We also find that the trial court did not err in refusing to give a missing witness charge, inasmuch as defendant made no showing that the undercover officer's partner or the sergeant supervising the operation could...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.