1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 114 Wn.2d
  5. 114 Wn.2d 373 (1990)
 

BINKLEY v. CITY OF TACOMA

No. 55888-4.

114 Wn.2d 373 (1990)

787 P.2d 1366

KENNETH L. BINKLEY, Appellant, v. THE CITY OF TACOMA, Respondent.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

March 22, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Patricia Padilla Skrinar, for appellant.

Robert J. Backstein, City Attorney, and William J. Barker, Mark L. Bubenik, and George S. Karavitis, Assistants, for respondent.

DURHAM, J.

Kenneth L. Binkley challenges the constitutionality of a municipality's employment decision. He alleges that the City of Tacoma (Tacoma) violated his right of free speech by reassigning him to another job after he lodged a complaint against his supervisor. He also alleges that the working conditions at his new job constituted constructive discharge. In an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the trial court found...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases