We hold that evidence obtained in a governmental employer's search of an employee's private briefcase should not be excluded in this disciplinary proceeding before the California State Personnel Board (Personnel Board). In reaching this latter conclusion, we distinguish on its facts our recent decision in Dyson v. State Personnel Bd. (1989)
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
FINKELSTEIN v. STATE PERSONNEL BD.
Docket No. C004206.
218 Cal.App.3d 264 (1990)
267 Cal. Rptr. 133
LEONARD FINKELSTEIN, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. STATE PERSONNEL BOARD, Defendant and Appellant; FRANCHISE TAX BOARD, Real Party in Interest and Appellant.
Court of Appeals of California, Third District.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
February 26, 1990.
February 26, 1990.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, Richard M. Frank, Paul H. Dobson, Shelley Mydans and Susan P. Underwood, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendant and Appellant and for Real Party in Interest and Appellant.
Gary P. Reynolds and Darrell S. Steinberg for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Court of Appeals of California, Third District.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
