Defendant's participation as an accomplice in the sale of two vials of crack to undercover police officers in exchange for $20 in prerecorded buy money was established beyond a reasonable doubt through the eyewitness testimony of two undercover police officers. Contrary to defendant's argument, the absence of drugs or money on defendant's person at the time of his arrest essentially corroborates the testimony of the undercover officers. Defendant, after having exchanged drugs...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
