O'LASKEY v. SORTINO

Docket No. B040928.

224 Cal.App.3d 241 (1990)

273 Cal. Rptr. 674

PHILLIP J. O'LASKEY, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. MIKE SORTINO, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One.

October 2, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Robert S. Gerstein for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Douglas A. Amo for Defendant and Respondent.


OPINION

VOGEL, J.

Plaintiff Phillip J. O'Laskey appeals from a judgment entered after defendant Mike Sortino's motion for summary judgment was granted. O'Laskey contends the trial court erred by refusing to receive in evidence a transcript of a tape-recorded telephone conversation which, if admitted, would have created a triable issue of material fact concerning the timeliness of O'Laskey's complaint. Alternatively, O'Laskey contends...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases