On this appeal, defendant argues, among other things, that the lineup identification should have been suppressed as tainted by the complainant's photographic identification. We disagree. As correctly noted by the trial court in denying defendant's motion to suppress after the hearing held pursuant to United States v Wade (
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.