STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. v. PUBLIC ADVOCATE


118 N.J. 336 (1990)

571 A.2d 957

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, RESPONDENT AND CROSS-APPELLANT, v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF THE PUBLIC ADVOCATE, APPELLANT AND CROSS-RESPONDENT. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF THE PUBLIC ADVOCATE, APPELLANT, v. NEW JERSEY MEDICAL MALPRACTICE REINSURANCE ASSOCIATION, RESPONDENT. INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC., RESPONDENT AND CROSS-APPELLANT, v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF THE PUBLIC ADVOCATE, APPELLANT AND CROSS-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided April 5, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard E. Shapiro, Director, Division of Public Interest Advocacy, argued the cause for appellant and cross-respondent Department of the Public Advocate.

Thomas P. Weidner argued the cause for respondent and cross-appellant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (Jamieson, Moore, Peskin & Spicer, attorneys; Thomas P. Weidner and Edward McCardell, on the briefs).

Elizabeth J. Sher argued the cause for respondent and cross-appellant Insurance Services Office, Inc. (Pitney, Hardin, Kipp & Szuch, attorneys; Elizabeth J. Sher, Clyde A. Szuch, and David M. Fabian, on the briefs).

Hugh P. Francis argued the cause for respondent New Jersey Medical Malpractice Reinsurance Association (Francis & Berry, attorneys; Evelyn Cadorin Farkas, on the brief).

Elmer M. Matthews argued the cause for amicus curiae American Insurance Association.


The opinion of the Court was delivered by O'HERN, J.

One essential aspect of the business of insurance is to predict the statistical occurrence of certain risks of human or business activities. The recent San Francisco earthquake and Hurricane Hugo bring the issues into focus. Every consumer of insurance runs a certain statistical risk of loss. In essence, the consumers pool their chances to minimize catastrophic individual losses. They pay premiums to insurance companies...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases