1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 387 S.E.2d
  5. 387 S.E.2d 57 (1990)
 

GOODWIN v. ZEYDEL

No. 8928DC616.

387 S.E.2d 57 (1990)

96 N.C. App. 670

Dorothy D. GOODWIN, Plaintiff, v. Walter H. ZEYDEL, Defendant.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

January 4, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gum & Hillier, P.A., by Howard L. Gum, Asheville, for plaintiff-appellee.

Whalen, Hay, Pitts, Hugenschmidt, Master, Devereux & Belser, P.A. by James J. Hugenschmidt and Barry L. Master, Asheville, for defendant-appellant.

WELLS, Judge.

Ordinarily, an order denying a motion to amend is interlocutory and not immediately appealable. However, both N.C.Gen.Stat. § 1-277(a) (1983) and 7A-27(d)(1) (1989) allow for an appeal as a matter of right from an interlocutory order which affects a substantial right. In this case, the trial court's order of 27 January 1989 had the effect of forever barring defendant from asserting a claim for equitable distribution, and thus affected a substantial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases