1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 219 Cal.App.3d
  5. 219 Cal.App.3d 218 (1990)
 

SESLER v. GHUMMAN

Docket No. G006819.

219 Cal.App.3d 218 (1990)

268 Cal. Rptr. 70

FRANKLIN ROBERT SESLER, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. INDERBIR GHUMMAN et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three.

March 28, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Hill, Genson, Even, Crandall & Wade, Horvitz & Levy, David M. Axelrad and Mitchell C. Tilner for Defendants and Appellants.

Ingram & Truett, Robert B. Ingram, Harold J. Truett III and Richard V. McMillan for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

TAYLOR, J.*

Does the trial judge have a duty to specially instruct the jury, other than in the words of Vehicle Code section 218011 and BAJI No. 5.21, on the duty of a left-turning driver where, as here, some but not all of the oncoming vehicles have yielded the right-of-way? We hold, under the circumstances of this case, he does.

I

This is an action...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases