PEOPLE v. FRAZIER


159 A.D.2d 278 (1990)

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Kevin Frazier, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

March 13, 1990


Contrary to defendant's contention, the trial court acted within its discretion in determining that the interpreter was competent (People v Catron, 143 A.D.2d 468). There was no showing that any serious error in translation occurred during trial which would warrant a reversal (People v Rolston, 109 A.D.2d 854, 855).

Defendant raises several arguments with respect to the prosecutor...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases