FOX v. BICANIC


163 A.D.2d 272 (1990)

Laura Fox et al., Appellants, v. Slavko Bicanic et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

July 2, 1990


Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The defendants attribute their delay in answering to the fact that the summons and complaint, which were mailed to the claims department of their insurance carrier were never received by the latter. The defendants had initially forwarded the summons and complaint to their insurance broker who in turn mailed those papers together with a loss report to the insurance carrier. Thereafter, upon receipt...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases