1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 241 N.J.
  5. 241 N.J. Super. 193 (1990)
 

KAJETZKE v. NEW JERSEY BELL

241 N.J. Super. 193 (1990)

574 A.2d 539

EILEEN KAJETZKE AND OTTO KAJETZKE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. NEW JERSEY BELL, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND RYAN A. CONOVER AND ALAN P. CONOVER, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 14, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roger J. Desiderio argued the cause for appellants (Bendit, Weinstock & Sharbaugh, attorneys; Alan Roth, on the brief).

Ernest D. Wildenhain argued the cause for respondent.

Before Judges BRODY and SKILLMAN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by SKILLMAN, J.A.D.

The issue presented by this appeal is whether expert testimony is required to maintain a personal injury action against a public utility for a dangerous roadway condition created by the utility in the course of repairing its facilities.

Defendant New Jersey Bell sent a work crew to repair telephone facilities located on a county highway in Freehold...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases