1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 167 A.D.2d
  5. 167 A.D.2d 267 (1990)
 

DiIORIO v. GIBSON & CUSHMAN OF NEW YORK, INC.

167 A.D.2d 267 (1990)

Joseph P. DiIorio, Appellant, v. Gibson & Cushman of New York, Inc., et al., Respondents Joseph P. DiIorio, Appellant-Respondent, v. Gibson & Cushman of New York, Inc., Defendant, and Gibson & Cushman Dredging Corporation, Respondent-Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

November 20, 1990

As the question of prejudgment interest was not presented to the jury in this maritime personal injury action, the court is without authority to award it. (Pires v Frota Oceanica Brasileira, 161 A.D.2d 129, 132; Havis v Petroleum Helicopters, 664 F.2d 54, 55.) Even without that rule, plaintiff's failure to seek prejudgment interest in connection...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases