1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 114 Wn.2d
  5. 114 Wn.2d 320 (1990)
 

PRESBYTERY OF SEATTLE v. KING COUNTY

No. 56111-7.

114 Wn.2d 320 (1990)

787 P.2d 907

PRESBYTERY OF SEATTLE, Petitioner, v. KING COUNTY, Respondent.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

March 15, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Montgomery, Purdue, Blankinship & Austin, by John D. Blankinship and Gale D. Barbee, for petitioner.

Norm Maleng, Prosecuting Attorney, and Ann Schindler, Senior Deputy, for respondent.

ANDERSEN, J.

FACTS OF CASE

A well respected commentator on land use law, Professor Richard L. Settle of the University of Puget Sound Law School, recently wrote that "[r]egulatory taking doctrine is the most perplexing area of American land use law."1 By our opinion herein, we deal with that subject, elaborate upon our opinion in Orion Corp. v. State, 109 Wn.2d 621, 747...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases