1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ill.
  4. 201 Ill.
  5. 201 Ill. App.3d 232 (1990)
 

CLAXTON v. THACKSTON

No. 1-89-1213.

201 Ill. App.3d 232 (1990)

559 N.E.2d 82

JOHN CLAXTON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RICHARD D. THACKSTON, SR., d/b/a A Storage Inn, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff (Mayer Manufacturing Corporation, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant).

Appellate Court of Illinois — First District (6th Division).

Opinion filed June 29, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David J. Fitzpatrick, of Matyas & Norris, of Chicago, for appellant.

Edward L. Osowski, of Chicago (James G. Andros, of counsel), for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

JUSTICE RAKOWSKI delivered the opinion of the court:

In this appeal, we are asked to decide whether an eyewitness statement given by an employee of defendant Mayer Manufacturing Corp. (Mayer) is an attorney-client communication and, therefore, privileged from disclosure under Supreme Court Rule 201(b)(2) (107 Ill.2d R. 201(b)(2)). The circuit court ordered production; defendant refused and was held in contempt. The court then entered judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases